FDA Product Index
This selected index is generated from data/fda-products.csv. It links to specific historical US authorization records used as teaching examples. It is not a complete current inventory, a purchasing recommendation, or a statement that every version of a named product has the same indication. The non-CXR records were reviewed for this edition on 22 September 2026.
| Modality | Device | Vendor | Submission | Indication summary | Boundary | FDA record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cxr | Critical Care Suite | GE HealthCare | K183182 (2019) | Frontal CXR pneumothorax triage; adult-size patients | Notification only; physician image review retained; historical clearance checked 2026-09-04 | Source |
| cxr | Red Dot | Behold.ai | K191556 (2020) | Adult CXR suspected pneumothorax case prioritization | Not localization or pneumothorax rule-out; historical clearance checked 2026-09-04 | Source |
| cxr | Lunit INSIGHT CXR Triage | Lunit | K211733 (2021) | Adult CXR pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax triage | Passive case-level prioritization; not standalone diagnosis; historical clearance checked 2026-09-04 | Source |
| ct | ContaCT | Viz.ai | DEN170073; De Novo | Parallel notification of suspected LVO on supported brain CTA | Triage; diagnostic image review retained; original historical indication | Source |
| ct | BriefCase | Aidoc | K180647; 510(k) | Suspected intracranial hemorrhage triage on noncontrast head CT | This record is not a combined ICH/PE indication | Source |
| mri | NeuroQuant | CorTechs Labs | K061855; 510(k) | Labeling and volumetric quantification of brain structures on MR images | Original quantitative software record; not autonomous etiologic diagnosis | Source |
| us | Caption Guidance | Bay Labs / Caption Health | DEN190040; De Novo | Guidance for acquiring specified adult 2D transthoracic echo views | Supported hardware and users; acquisition assistance rather than diagnosis | Source |
| mammo | Transpara 2.1.0 | ScreenPoint Medical | K241831; 510(k) | Physician reading assistance for supported screening mammography and DBT | Concurrent assistance; not autonomous management or universal scanner support | Source |
| nm | SubtlePET | Subtle Medical | K182336; 510(k) | Processing including noise reduction for specified FDG and amyloid PET images | Supported PET and hybrid inputs; not general tracer diagnosis | Source |
| ophtho | IDx-DR | IDx | DEN180001; De Novo | Autonomous DR screening in the specified adult diabetic population | Original indication includes age 22 or older and no prior DR diagnosis; compatible camera required | Source |
| video | GI Genius | Cosmo Artificial Intelligence | DEN200055; De Novo | Real-time colorectal mucosal lesion detection assistance during colonoscopy | Supported adult workflow and hardware; no histology or autonomous treatment | Source |
| path | Paige Prostate | Paige.AI | DEN200080; De Novo | Aid for cancer detection in specified prostate needle-biopsy H&E WSI | Original workflow follows pathologist review; not grading or tumor measurement | Source |
Read the record behind the product name
A 510(k) clearance, a De Novo authorization, and premarket approval are distinct regulatory pathways. Use the language appropriate to the actual record. The book’s inherited chapter heading “FDA-cleared AI products” is a convenient category heading; individual tables explicitly identify De Novo records rather than calling every authorization a clearance.
Start with the submission number, device name, intended use, indications, compatible inputs and hardware, user population, and limitations. Then determine whether the local workflow matches those conditions. Do not attach a later product-family claim to an earlier submission merely because the names are similar.
| Claimed role | Question to resolve |
|---|---|
| Triage or notification | Does it change worklist priority, and what diagnostic review remains required? |
| Detection assistance | What findings, images, users, and reading configuration are supported? |
| Acquisition guidance | Which views and hardware are covered, and who judges adequacy? |
| Quantification | What is measured, in which units, and what diagnosis is not established? |
| Autonomous screening | Which population, acquisition, target condition, and no-result pathway are specified? |
| Image enhancement | Which acquisitions and quantitative or diagnostic claims are supported? |
The FDA AI-enabled device list provides a broader discovery resource and explains that it is not comprehensive. Use its submission links and the applicable current labeling when evaluating a real deployment. Authorization does not eliminate the need to verify interoperability, local workflow, training, monitoring, and change management.
Absence from this appendix means only that no example has been curated here. It is not evidence that a modality lacks authorized devices. Products outside the United States require review under the relevant jurisdiction rather than extrapolation from this index.